no, i don't really...like his lifestyle, it is by his own choice.lululu wrote:And you wonder why your brother "imposes exile upon himself."
--The lulu
Mormon Discussions
Mormon Discussions...because we all want the truth.Here is a place of free discussion. Whether you want to discuss the finer intricacies of doctrine, or whether you want to discuss the truthiness of the church in general, your word will be heard here.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
no, i don't really...like his lifestyle, it is by his own choice.lululu wrote:And you wonder why your brother "imposes exile upon himself."
--The lulu
subgenius wrote:no, i don't really...like his lifestyle, it is by his own choice.lululu wrote:And you wonder why your brother "imposes exile upon himself."
--The lulu
Here's a thought subby,
Spend some time as a gay man.
I don't mean choose to be gay because we all know that's nonsense. What I mean is, spend a month pretending to be a gay man. Let you wife in on the test but to everyone else 'come out' and see how it feels and how you get valued.
bcspace wrote:Here's a thought subby,
Spend some time as a gay man.
I don't mean choose to be gay because we all know that's nonsense. What I mean is, spend a month pretending to be a gay man. Let you wife in on the test but to everyone else 'come out' and see how it feels and how you get valued.
Been there, done that. Not become or pretended to be gay, but lived, worked, and moved socially in gay communities long enough to know that yes, it's a vile, vulgar, and desperate lifestyle.
Where can i find that Prophet's counsel?Drifting1 wrote:Sub,
Did you follow the Prophets counsel in giving of your time and money to the activism against homosexual equality that would afford your brother the same domestic happiness that you yourself have?
subgenius wrote:moronic.White Buffalo wrote:Sex outside of marriage has long been considered by the church to be fornication. Now the church has come out squarely in favor of fornication, going so far as to dissolve marriages so that fornication can resume unhindered. Apparently it is the church's wish to fight against measures to reduce fornication domestically and internationally.
and interesting to see your veiled support of beastiality.
bcspace wrote:
Been there, done that. Not become or pretended to be gay, but lived, worked, and moved socially in gay communities long enough to know that yes, it's a vile, vulgar, and desperate lifestyle.
subgenius wrote:Where can i find that Prophet's counsel?Drifting1 wrote:Sub,
Did you follow the Prophets counsel in giving of your time and money to the activism against homosexual equality that would afford your brother the same domestic happiness that you yourself have?
From a letter read over the pulpit as far and as wide as the UK.A broad-based coalition of churches and other organizations placed the proposed amendment on the ballot. The Church will participate with this coalition in seeking its passage. Local Church leaders will provide information about how you may become involved in this important cause.
We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to assure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman. Our best efforts are required to preserve the sacred institution of marriage
Actually, that letter was not read "far and wide"...my ward never heard it.Drifting1 wrote:
Here you go...
From a letter read over the pulpit as far and as wide as the UK.
Now available online at the LDS newsroom.
mormonnewsroom.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/california-and-same-sex-marriage
you don't "refute" someone with their finger placed firmly inside their nose...you just simply look awayWhite Buffalo wrote:subgenius wrote:moronic.White Buffalo wrote:Sex outside of marriage has long been considered by the church to be fornication. Now the church has come out squarely in favor of fornication, going so far as to dissolve marriages so that fornication can resume unhindered. Apparently it is the church's wish to fight against measures to reduce fornication domestically and internationally.
and interesting to see your veiled support of beastiality.
It's interesting to see your inability to refute what I said.
subgenius wrote:
you don't "refute" someone with their finger placed firmly inside their nose...you just simply look away
interesting indeed
subgenius wrote:Actually, that letter was not read "far and wide"...my ward never heard it.Drifting1 wrote:
Here you go...
From a letter read over the pulpit as far and as wide as the UK.
Now available online at the LDS newsroom.
mormonnewsroom.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/california-and-same-sex-marriage
from your own citation
"The following letter was sent from the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to Church leaders in California to be read to all congregations on 29 June 2008:"
unfortunately i am not a member in California.
well, lets see....Drifting1 wrote:subgenius wrote:Actually, that letter was not read "far and wide"...my ward never heard it.Drifting1 wrote:
Here you go...
From a letter read over the pulpit as far and as wide as the UK.
Now available online at the LDS newsroom.
mormonnewsroom.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/california-and-same-sex-marriage
from your own citation
"The following letter was sent from the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to Church leaders in California to be read to all congregations on 29 June 2008:"
unfortunately i am not a member in California.
Sorry sub, your ward may not have read it out. But it was read out, over the pulpit, beyond California and beyond the States. But let's put that to one side.
If this letter came to your ward, would you rally to the cry and give of your time and money to fight same sex marital equality?
subgenius wrote:
by the way
this counsel is hardly the one you earlier describe as
"..giving of your time and money to the activism against homosexual equality"
We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to assure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman. Our best efforts are required to preserve the sacred institution of marriage
subgenius wrote:
well, lets see....
the letter states:
"We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to assure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman"
sure, i would do all that i could, but i already do that.
by the way
this counsel is hardly the one you earlier describe as
"..giving of your time and money to the activism against homosexual equality"
once again we see your distortions and blatant mis-characterizations being less than useful to your cause.
homosexual inequality is a myth
homosexual inequality is a myth
homosexual inequality is a myth
Since when is that so?
all of themDrifting1 wrote:Sub,
From the LDS sponsored website 'Protect Marriage' here is a list of things that they ask you to do. Which ones would you be prepared to do in the fight against allowing your brother all the same marital rights and privileges that you enjoy?
1. Join the campaign team
2. Put up a campaign sign in your garden
3. Sign the petition
4. Tell 5 friends to get involved
5. Donate money to Protect Marriage
6. But campaign marketing materials and use them, such as flyers, badges etc
7. Attend campaign rally's and events
8. Vote
This is what your Church wants you to do to fight to protect marriage as a solely heterosexual institution. Which would you do?
still not as you have attempted to demonize.Drifting1 wrote:subgenius wrote:
by the way
this counsel is hardly the one you earlier describe as
"..giving of your time and money to the activism against homosexual equality"
Cue rebuttal from the mouth of the First Presidency...
We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to assure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman. Our best efforts are required to preserve the sacred institution of marriage
please, refrain from using "stick it" and "homos" in the same context, it is very unsettling.White Buffalo wrote:An excellent summation of the letter is "stick it to them homos!!"
subgenius wrote:please, refrain from using "stick it" and "homos" in the same context, it is very unsettling.White Buffalo wrote:An excellent summation of the letter is "stick it to them homos!!"
bcspace wrote:
It's true even now. No law prevents a homosexual from marrying another homosexual and as for state recognized marriages, all are equal before the law because the requirement is the same for heterosexuals and homosexuals alike.
subgenius wrote:please, refrain from using "stick it" and "homos" in the same context, it is very unsettling.White Buffalo wrote:An excellent summation of the letter is "stick it to them homos!!"
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum